IntroToCryptos.ca




AI Avatar Video Production
Turn Your Existing Marketing Budget Into Lasting Video Assets.
Press release effectiveness has been declining for years. Video consumption keeps growing. AI avatar production made the format affordable. The numbers tell a story most marketing managers haven’t acted on yet. Connect with Doug on LinkedIn to explore what your budget could build.
The Numbers Most Marketing Managers Haven’t Sat Down With.
Roughly 4.4 million blog posts are published every single day across the internet. Press release wire services distribute thousands of new releases each business day. The average sponsored article gets the majority of its lifetime traffic in the first 72 hours after publication.
Meanwhile, the average YouTube video continues generating views for years after its publish date. Video content drives several times the engagement of written content on LinkedIn. And the marketing teams that have shifted budget toward consistent video output are reporting compounding returns that written content distribution has never produced.
Then there’s this number. The cost of producing one broadcast-quality video segment using AI avatar technology has dropped to roughly the cost of a single sponsored article placement on a major publication. Not a fraction more. Not a small premium. Roughly equal cost, fundamentally different asset.
When you look at those numbers together, a question forms that’s worth letting yourself ask.
If You Could Buy Either Asset For The Same Price, Which Would You Choose?
Asset A is a sponsored article. It will get its initial pickup within a few days of publication. Most of its lifetime traffic will occur in the first week. After ninety days, it’s effectively buried under newer content. Its contribution to your brand twelve months from now will be near zero.
Asset B is a broadcast-quality video segment. It will live on YouTube indefinitely. It will embed across your social channels and your website. It will continue accumulating views, embeds, and search authority for years. Its contribution to your brand twelve months from now will be larger than its contribution today.
Same price. Two completely different outcomes.
If a budget review revealed that you were spending equally on both formats year after year, but only one of them was still working a year later, how long would you keep that allocation?
The Question Underneath That Question.
You probably didn’t choose your current content mix this year. You inherited it from when video was genuinely expensive and press releases were genuinely effective. That allocation made sense for the conditions that existed when it was set.
But conditions changed, and most marketing budgets didn’t change with them.
So when you look at your current content output, the real question isn’t whether press releases work. The question is whether the version of you that set this year’s budget would set the same budget if they were sitting at the desk today, looking at the current numbers.
Probably not. Almost certainly not, actually.
Because the math has changed enough that the old allocation is no longer the rational one.
The Questions Worth Sitting With Before You Act.
What percentage of your current content output is still generating attention six months after publication?
If your CEO or board asked you tomorrow to point to the assets your marketing budget has built over the past twelve months, what could you actually show them?
When your competitors who have already made the shift to consistent video output start showing up at the top of search results and dominating the LinkedIn feed in your industry, what does that mean for your position?
And the harder question. If the shift to AI avatar video production becomes obvious to everyone in your industry within twelve to eighteen months, would you rather be the marketing manager who moved first, or the one who explained why your output looked smaller than the teams that did?
What This Service Actually Is.
We produce AI avatar video. Newscast-style segments, documentary features, longer analytical pieces, explainer videos. Scripted to your brand, produced in broadcast quality, turned around in days rather than weeks.
Multiple custom anchor voices are available, so your content can range across formats and tones without casting new talent every time.
Engagements are custom-scoped. Some companies start with a single campaign to test the format. Most settle into a recurring monthly or quarterly cadence, because the asset-building math only works when production is consistent.
Live examples of production quality and anchor variety are on the IntroToCryptos YouTube channel, where the same newsroom produces our own market coverage.
About Doug
Doug founded IntroToCryptos.ca after twenty-five years across commodities and crypto markets. He built the AI newsroom that produces both retail content and B2B client work, and he personally handles every first conversation with marketing managers exploring AI avatar production for their organization.
Read Doug’s background at https://ai-businessplans.com/authors/douglas-lampi
The Next Step
If the numbers above prompted any uncomfortable questions, those are exactly the questions worth bringing to a conversation.
Connect with Doug on LinkedIn. Tell him what your current content allocation looks like. He’ll tell you honestly whether AI avatar production is a fit for what you’re trying to build. Sometimes it isn’t. A short exchange is the fastest way to find out.
Connect with Doug on LinkedIn →
Discover more from introtocryptos.ca
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
| Custom | All engagements are custom-scoped after a discovery conversation. Pricing is established based on production volume, format, and recurring cadence. |
|---|




